Skip to content

Launching Nov 2026.

Reference

Needle Fear Statistics

How many people are afraid of needles, what it makes them avoid, how often they faint, and what the trials say about VR distraction. Thirty figures, each linked to the peer-reviewed study it comes from, with the population it was measured in.

Every figure verified against its source on 10 Sep 2026

ShareLinkedInXEmail

Four numbers to remember

  • 63%

    of children reported a fear of needles

    Taddio 2012

  • 20–30%

    of young adults, across studies

    McLenon & Rogers 2019

  • 16%

    of adult patients avoided a flu shot because of needle fear

    McLenon & Rogers 2019

  • 2.2×

    the odds of vaccine hesitancy when injection fear is present

    Freeman 2021

In short

Fear of needles is reported by the majority of children, 20 to 50% of adolescents and 20 to 30% of young adults, and it falls with age. Clinical needle phobia is rarer, around 3 to 4% of adults. The fear has consequences: 16% of adult patients have avoided a flu shot because of it, needle-fearful adults are nine times more likely to avoid care involving needles, and people who screen positive for injection phobia have twice the odds of vaccine hesitancy.

How Common Is Fear of Needles?

Most surveys ask a single question, "are you afraid of needles?", and get a yes from a fifth to a quarter of adults and most children. Clinical phobia, measured against diagnostic criteria, is about an order of magnitude rarer. Both are real; they are not the same number.

Self-reported fear of needles, by population

Percent who said yes. Bars show the range reported across studies; dots are single-study estimates.

0%20%40%60%Children (Toronto survey) · Taddio 2012Children (Toronto survey)63%Adolescents (range across studies) · McLenon 2019Adolescents (range across studies)20–50%Young adults (range across studies) · McLenon 2019Young adults (range across studies)20–30%Parents (Toronto survey) · Taddio 2012Parents (Toronto survey)24%General practice patients (Queensland) · Wright 2009General practice patients (Queensland)22%Hospital phlebotomy patients (USA) · Deacon 2006Hospital phlebotomy patients (USA)14.8%
Show the numbers
ValueSource
Children (Toronto survey)63%Taddio 2012
Adolescents (range across studies)20–50%McLenon 2019
Young adults (range across studies)20–30%McLenon 2019
Parents (Toronto survey)24%Taddio 2012
General practice patients (Queensland)22%Wright 2009
Hospital phlebotomy patients (USA)14.8%Deacon 2006
  • Survey · 2012

    63%Nearly 2 in 3 children

    of 1,024 children surveyed at a Toronto museum reported a fear of needles.

    Taddio 2012, VaccineRead the publication

  • Meta-analysis · 2019

    20–50%Adolescents

    range of needle-fear prevalence reported across the studies in a review of 119 papers.

    McLenon 2019, Journal of Advanced NursingRead the publication

  • Meta-analysis · 2019

    20–30%Young adults

    range of needle-fear prevalence across studies in the same review.

    McLenon 2019, Journal of Advanced NursingRead the publication

  • Survey · 2012

    24%1 in 4 parents

    of 883 parents in the same Toronto survey reported a fear of needles, against 63% of their children.

    Taddio 2012, VaccineRead the publication

  • Survey · 2009

    22%GP patients

    of 177 patients at an Australian general practice reported a fear of needles.

    Wright 2009, Australian Family PhysicianRead the publication

  • Survey · 2003

    21.7%Young travellers

    of 400 travel-clinic attendees, median age 25, said they were afraid of injections; in 8.2% the fear was 'unreasonably intense'.

    Nir 2003, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and HygieneRead the publication

  • Observational study · 2006

    14.8%Blood-draw patients

    of 3,315 US phlebotomy patients usually feel anxious about blood draws or injections; 7.5% called the fear excessive.

    Deacon 2006, Journal of Anxiety DisordersRead the publication

  • Survey · 2021

    26.2%UK adults

    of 15,014 UK adults screened positive for blood-injection-injury phobia on a screening scale (not a diagnosis).

    Freeman 2021, Psychological MedicineRead the publication

  • Cohort study · 1998

    3.5%Lifetime phobia

    lifetime prevalence of diagnosable blood-injection-injury phobia among 1,920 Baltimore adults.

    Bienvenu 1998, Psychological MedicineRead the publication

  • Survey · 1996

    ~3%Point prevalence

    of Swedish adults met criteria for injection, dentist or injury phobia (3.2% of women, 2.7% of men).

    Fredrikson 1996, Behaviour Research and TherapyRead the publication

  • Cohort study · 1998

    5.5 yrsMedian age of onset

    for blood-injection-injury phobia. The fear starts in early childhood and, for a minority, never leaves.

    Bienvenu 1998, Psychological MedicineRead the publication

  • Meta-analysis · 2019

    ↓ with ageFalls with age

    from a majority of children to 20 to 50% of adolescents to 20 to 30% of young adults; more common in females.

    McLenon 2019, Journal of Advanced NursingRead the publication

What Needle Fear Makes People Avoid

The cost of needle fear is not the fear itself but the appointments that never happen: the flu shot skipped, the blood test rescheduled three times, the vaccine declined for a reason nobody writes down.

Avoided a flu shot because of needle fear

Percent, from individual studies summarised in McLenon & Rogers 2019.

0%15%30%Hospital employees: 27%Hospital employees27%Long-term-care workers: 18%Long-term-care workers18%Adult patients: 16%Adult patients16%Hospital healthcare workers: 8%Hospital healthcare workers8%
Show the numbers
ValueSource
Hospital employees27%McLenon 2019
Long-term-care workers18%McLenon 2019
Adult patients16%McLenon 2019
Hospital healthcare workers8%McLenon 2019
  • Meta-analysis · 2019

    16%Adult patients

    avoided influenza vaccination because of needle fear.

    McLenon 2019, Journal of Advanced NursingRead the publication

  • Meta-analysis · 2019

    27%Hospital employees

    avoided influenza vaccination because of needle fear; 18% of long-term-care workers and 8% of hospital healthcare workers did the same.

    McLenon 2019, Journal of Advanced NursingRead the publication

  • Survey · 2012

    7–8%Skipped a vaccine

    of parents (7%) and children (8%) in the Toronto survey cited needle fear as the primary reason for immunisation non-compliance.

    Taddio 2012, VaccineRead the publication

  • Survey · 2009

    20.5% vs 2.3%9× more likely to avoid care

    needle-fearful versus non-fearful GP patients who reported avoiding medical treatment involving needles.

    Wright 2009, Australian Family PhysicianRead the publication

  • Survey · 2021

    2.2×Vaccine hesitancy

    the odds of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among UK adults who screened positive for injection phobia (22.0% vs 11.5%).

    Freeman 2021, Psychological MedicineRead the publication

  • Survey · 2021

    ~10%Of all hesitancy

    might be prevented if injection fears were removed, by the study's population-attributable estimate (11.5%).

    Freeman 2021, Psychological MedicineRead the publication

Fainting and Vasovagal Reactions

Actually fainting during a hospital blood draw is rare. Having felt faint before is not, and it is concentrated almost entirely in the people who are most afraid.

History of feeling faint or fainting at a needle

Percent of 3,315 phlebotomy patients, probable needle phobia versus no needle fear.

0%35%70%Needle phobia: felt faint before: 63.9%Needle phobia: felt faint before63.9%Needle phobia: fainted before: 23.6%Needle phobia: fainted before23.6%No fear: felt faint before: 4.8%No fear: felt faint before4.8%No fear: fainted before: 2.4%No fear: fainted before2.4%
Show the numbers
ValueSource
Needle phobia: felt faint before63.9%Deacon 2006
Needle phobia: fainted before23.6%Deacon 2006
No fear: felt faint before4.8%Deacon 2006
No fear: fainted before2.4%Deacon 2006
  • Observational study · 2006

    9.5%Have felt faint before

    of 3,315 US phlebotomy patients reported a history of vasovagal reactions at injections or blood draws.

    Deacon 2006, Journal of Anxiety DisordersRead the publication

  • Observational study · 2006

    4.3%Have actually fainted

    of the same patients reported fainting at a previous injection or blood draw.

    Deacon 2006, Journal of Anxiety DisordersRead the publication

  • Observational study · 2006

    0.2%Fainted at the observed draw

    of patients fainted during the blood draw the researchers observed; 0.4% felt very faint. Actual syncope in the chair is rare.

    Deacon 2006, Journal of Anxiety DisordersRead the publication

  • Observational study · 2006

    63.9% vs 4.8%Phobia concentrates the risk

    prior vasovagal reactions among probable needle-phobic patients versus those with no needle fear; prior fainting 23.6% vs 2.4%.

    Deacon 2006, Journal of Anxiety DisordersRead the publication

  • Cohort study · 2010

    2.3×First-time donors

    the odds of a systemic vasovagal reaction versus repeat donors, among 591,177 US whole-blood donors.

    Rios 2010, TransfusionRead the publication

  • Cohort study · 2010

    3.7×16-year-old donors

    the odds of a vasovagal reaction in the same donor population; low blood volume raised the odds 3.3×.

    Rios 2010, TransfusionRead the publication

Blood Donation and Retention

Blood services measure return rates precisely, which makes donation the clearest evidence that a bad experience in the chair costs a repeat visit.

First-time donors who gave again within 12 months

Percent, by reaction at the first donation. American Red Cross, 2009.

0%20%40%No reaction: 35%No reaction35%Felt faint: 27%Felt faint27%Fainted: 18%Fainted18%
Show the numbers
ValueSource
No reaction35%Eder 2012
Felt faint27%Eder 2012
Fainted18%Eder 2012
  • Cohort study · 2012

    18% vs 35%Return after fainting

    of first-time donors who fainted gave again within 12 months, versus 27% after feeling faint and 35% with no reaction.

    Eder 2012, TransfusionRead the publication

  • Cohort study · 2005

    −50%Moderate or severe reaction

    or worse: the reduction in likelihood of repeat donation among 89,587 Red Cross donors.

    France 2005, Transfusion and Apheresis ScienceRead the publication

  • Cohort study · 2005

    −20%Even a light reaction

    reduction in return rate for first-time donors after a light vasovagal reaction (33% for experienced donors).

    France 2005, Transfusion and Apheresis ScienceRead the publication

  • Cohort study · 2014

    33% vs 57%Fearful donors who reacted

    returned within a year, versus 57% of non-fearful donors who did not react, among 1,715 high-school donors.

    France 2014, TransfusionRead the publication

What It Costs a Clinic

Few studies measure minutes lost to fear directly. What is measured is how often needle procedures in children take more than one attempt, and how long they take, with cooperativeness among the predictors of success.

  • Observational study · 2010

    2 sticksAttempts per pediatric IV

    on average to place a peripheral IV in 592 hospitalised children; cooperativeness was among the predictors of success.

    Larsen 2010, Journal of Infusion NursingRead the publication

  • Observational study · 2010

    28 minMinutes per pediatric IV

    on average from first attempt to successful placement in the same study of 1,135 venipunctures.

    Larsen 2010, Journal of Infusion NursingRead the publication

  • Randomised trial · 2026

    54.5%First-attempt success in toddlers

    with the standard landmark method in children aged 0 to 3 in an emergency department (control arm).

    Wu 2026, European Journal of Emergency MedicineRead the publication

What the VR Distraction Trials Found

Every meta-analysis points the same way: less reported pain and fear in children when VR is used during a needle procedure. Every one of them also reports high variation between studies and low certainty. Both facts belong on the same page.

VR versus standard care: child-rated pain during needle procedures

Mean difference on 0 to 10 faces scales with 95% confidence intervals. Below zero favours VR.

-3-2-10Mean difference in pain scoreCáceres-Matos 2024, 21 studies: -1.83 (95% CI -2.93 to -0.72)Cáceres-Matos 2024, 21 studies-1.83Lluesma-Vidal 2022, 10 trials: -2.37 (95% CI -3.2 to -1.54)Lluesma-Vidal 2022, 10 trials-2.37Chan 2019 RCT, emergency dept: -1.78 (95% CI -3.24 to -0.317)Chan 2019 RCT, emergency dept-1.78Chan 2019 RCT, pathology: -1.39 (95% CI -2.68 to -0.11)Chan 2019 RCT, pathology-1.39
Show the numbers
ValueLower CIUpper CISource
Cáceres-Matos 2024, 21 studies-1.83-2.93-0.72Cáceres-Matos 2024
Lluesma-Vidal 2022, 10 trials-2.37-3.2-1.54Lluesma-Vidal 2022
Chan 2019 RCT, emergency dept-1.78-3.24-0.317Chan 2019
Chan 2019 RCT, pathology-1.39-2.68-0.11Chan 2019
  • Meta-analysis · 2024

    −1.83Child-rated pain

    mean difference on the 0 to 10 Wong-Baker FACES scale, VR versus standard care, across 21 studies (95% CI −2.93 to −0.72).

    Cáceres-Matos 2024, Nursing ReportsRead the publication

  • Meta-analysis · 2024

    −1.27Child-rated fear

    mean difference on the 0 to 4 Children's Fear Scale in the same meta-analysis (95% CI −1.99 to −0.56); heterogeneity was high.

    Cáceres-Matos 2024, Nursing ReportsRead the publication

  • Meta-analysis · 2022

    −2.37Pain, 10 pooled trials

    pooled effect for pain (95% CI −3.20 to −1.54) and −1.26 for fear, in participants under 21; study quality mostly low.

    Lluesma-Vidal 2022, JMIR Serious GamesRead the publication

  • Randomised trials · 2019

    −1.78Emergency department RCT

    less child-rated pain on the 0 to 10 Faces Pain Scale with VR during IV cannulation in 123 children aged 4 to 11; −1.39 in outpatient pathology.

    Chan 2019, The Journal of PediatricsRead the publication

  • Secondary analysis · 2024

    1.9 ptsThe most anxious benefit most

    more post-procedure anxiety under standard care than with high-immersion VR among the highest anxiety-sensitivity patients aged 10 to 21.

    Gold 2024, Journal of Medical Internet ResearchRead the publication

  • Guideline meta-analysis · 2026

    SMD −0.51During vaccination

    standardised mean difference in distress with VR, low-certainty evidence; music was the preferred intervention (SMD −0.38, moderate certainty).

    McMurtry 2026, The Clinical Journal of PainRead the publication

  • Cochrane review · 2018

    SMD −0.56Distraction in general

    for self-reported pain across 30 trials and 2,802 children; SMD −0.82 for distress. Low to very-low certainty.

    Birnie 2018, Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsRead the publication

  • Umbrella review · 2026

    11 reviewsThe caveat

    agree VR reduces pain, fear and anxiety in paediatric needle procedures, with heterogeneity around 90%, publication bias, and 'very weak' GRADE certainty.

    Saliba 2026, Clinical and Experimental PediatricsRead the publication

How to Read These Numbers

Fear is not phobia
Most prevalence figures come from a single survey question about fear. Phobia figures use diagnostic criteria and are roughly ten times lower. Freeman 2021's 26.2% is a screening-scale positive, not a diagnosis.
Samples are not national
The Toronto survey was a museum convenience sample, the Queensland figure is one practice, and the phlebotomy patients had, by definition, turned up for the draw. Every claim above names its population for that reason.
Ranges are ranges
McLenon & Rogers report needle fear in adolescents and young adults as ranges across studies, and describe children as 'the majority' rather than a pooled percentage. The flu-shot avoidance figures come from individual included studies.
Donors are not patients
Blood-donor reaction rates come from healthy volunteers giving a full unit and are not comparable to clinic blood draws, where observed fainting is rare.
Effect sizes use different scales
Mean differences are on 0 to 10 or 0 to 4 scales; standardised mean differences are unitless. Negative values favour VR. Every review notes high heterogeneity and low certainty, and the 2026 umbrella review found publication bias.

Frequently Asked Questions

How common is fear of needles in adults?

Across studies summarised in a 2019 systematic review, 20 to 30% of young adults report fear of needles, and the fear declines with age. Single-site surveys put it at 22% of general practice patients and 15% of hospital blood-draw patients, with 24% of parents in a Toronto survey.

How common is fear of needles in children?

The majority of children show needle fear according to the 2019 review, and 63% of children reported it in a Toronto survey of 1,024 children. In adolescents, estimates range from 20 to 50% across studies.

What percentage of people have a needle phobia?

Clinical blood-injection-injury phobia, diagnosed against DSM criteria, has a lifetime prevalence of about 3.5% and a point prevalence of about 3%. Among hospital phlebotomy patients, 2.2% met a conservative definition of probable needle phobia. Simple fear of needles is far more common.

How many people avoid vaccines because of needle fear?

In the studies summarised by McLenon & Rogers, 16% of adult patients and 27% of hospital employees avoided influenza vaccination because of needle fear. In a Toronto survey, needle fear was the primary reason for skipping a vaccine for 7% of parents and 8% of children, and UK adults who screened positive for injection phobia had twice the odds of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.

How often do people faint during a blood draw?

Rarely in the chair: 0.2% of 3,315 hospital phlebotomy patients fainted during the observed draw. About 9.5% reported having felt faint at a previous needle and 4.3% had fainted before, and the history was concentrated in needle-phobic patients (63.9% versus 4.8%).

Does VR distraction reduce pain and fear during needle procedures?

In children, meta-analyses report lower child-rated pain (mean differences of about 1.8 to 2.4 points on 0 to 10 scales) and fear with VR compared with standard care, and a 2026 umbrella review of 11 meta-analyses found the same direction. All of them note high variation between studies and low certainty of evidence, and adult evidence is smaller.

Cite This Page

SendorVR. Needle Fear Statistics. www.sendorvr.com/needle-fear-statistics. Figures verified 10 Sep 2026. Each statistic on this page links to the peer-reviewed study it was taken from; cite the original study for the figure and this page for the compilation.

ShareLinkedInXEmail

Sources

Every study cited above, in order of first appearance. Abstracts were retrieved from the publisher or the NCBI E-utilities API on the verification date.

  1. 1.Taddio A, Ipp M, Thivakaran S, et al. (2012). Survey of the prevalence of immunization non-compliance due to needle fears in children and adults. Vaccine. 883 parents and 1,024 children, Toronto (convenience sample). doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.011
  2. 2.McLenon J, Rogers MAM (2019). The fear of needles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 119 original studies, 35 in the meta-analysis. doi.org/10.1111/jan.13818
  3. 3.Wright S, Yelland M, Heathcote K, Ng SK (2009). Fear of needles: nature and prevalence in general practice. Australian Family Physician. 177 general practice patients, Queensland. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19283260/
  4. 4.Nir Y, Paz A, Sabo E, Potasman I (2003). Fear of injections in young adults: prevalence and associations. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 400 travel-clinic attendees, median age 25, Israel. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12685642/
  5. 5.Deacon B, Abramowitz J (2006). Fear of needles and vasovagal reactions among phlebotomy patients. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 3,315 patients at US hospital phlebotomy laboratories. doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.01.004
  6. 6.Freeman D, Lambe S, Yu LM, et al. (2021). Injection fears and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Psychological Medicine. 15,014 UK adults, quota-sampled online survey, January to February 2021. doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721002609
  7. 7.Bienvenu OJ, Eaton WW (1998). The epidemiology of blood-injection-injury phobia. Psychological Medicine. 1,920 adults, Baltimore ECA Follow-up Study. doi.org/10.1017/s0033291798007144
  8. 8.Fredrikson M, Annas P, Fischer H, Wik G (1996). Gender and age differences in the prevalence of specific fears and phobias. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 704 randomly selected adults aged 18 to 70, Sweden. doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(95)00048-3
  9. 9.Rios JA, Fang J, Tu Y, et al. (2010). The potential impact of selective donor deferrals based on estimated blood volume on vasovagal reactions and donor deferral rates. Transfusion. 591,177 US whole-blood donors (REDS-II). doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02578.x
  10. 10.Eder AF, Notari EP, Dodd RY (2012). Do reactions after whole blood donation predict syncope on return donation?. Transfusion. American Red Cross first-time whole-blood donors, 2009. doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03666.x
  11. 11.France CR, Rader A, Carlson B (2005). Donors who react may not come back: analysis of repeat donation as a function of phlebotomist ratings of vasovagal reactions. Transfusion and Apheresis Science. 89,587 whole-blood donors, American Red Cross Central Ohio, one year. doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2005.02.005
  12. 12.France CR, France JL, Carlson BW, et al. (2014). Fear of blood draws, vasovagal reactions, and retention among high school donors. Transfusion. 1,715 US high-school blood donors. doi.org/10.1111/trf.12368
  13. 13.Larsen P, Eldridge D, Brinkley J, et al. (2010). Pediatric peripheral intravenous access: does nursing experience and competence really make a difference?. Journal of Infusion Nursing. 592 hospitalised children, 1,135 venipunctures, two US hospitals. doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0b013e3181e3a0a8
  14. 14.Wu HP, Guo BC, Chang YJ, et al. (2026). Ultrasound-guided versus landmark peripheral intravenous catheterisation in children aged 0 to 3. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 105 children aged 0 to 3, paediatric emergency department, Taiwan. doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001355
  15. 15.Cáceres-Matos R, Castillo-García M, Magni E, Pabón-Carrasco M (2024). Effects of virtual reality on pain, fear and anxiety during needle procedures in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nursing Reports. 21 studies, 2,663 children and adolescents. doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14030182
  16. 16.Lluesma-Vidal M, Carcelén González R, García-Garcés L, et al. (2022). Effect of virtual reality on pediatric pain and fear during procedures involving needles: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Serious Games. 21 studies reviewed, 10 pooled; participants under 21. doi.org/10.2196/35008
  17. 17.Chan E, Hovenden M, Ramage E, et al. (2019). Virtual reality for pediatric needle procedural pain: two randomized clinical trials. The Journal of Pediatrics. 252 children aged 4 to 11, two Australian hospitals. doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.034
  18. 18.Gold JI, Akbar KM, Avila S, et al. (2024). Immersive virtual reality for pediatric venipuncture and IV placement: secondary analysis of two randomized trials. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 252 patients aged 10 to 21, Children's Hospital Los Angeles. doi.org/10.2196/53196
  19. 19.McMurtry CM, Taddio A, Shah V, et al. (2026). Psychological interventions for reducing vaccination pain and distress: HELPinKids&Adults guideline update. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 57 studies, infants to adults, vaccine injections. doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001376
  20. 20.Birnie KA, Noel M, Chambers CT, et al. (2018). Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 59 trials, 5,550 participants aged 2 to 19. doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005179.pub4
  21. 21.Saliba T, Fahrni G (2026). Virtual reality for paediatric needle procedures: an umbrella review. Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics. 11 meta-analyses, 49 unique primary studies. doi.org/10.3345/cep.2026.01221

Related Reading

See How SendorVR Works in Your Clinic

Book a short demo with our team to see how SendorVR can be deployed in your environment.